The Call of Duty franchise is hugely popular among shooting games. The first installment dropped in October 2003 and focused on World War II, allowing players to immerse themselves in the battlefield from a first-person perspective. As of now, there are 22 different Call of Duty titles out there. The settings and gameplay experiences vary significantly; some games take a futuristic approach with high-tech elements, while others dive into historical conflicts like WWII. Accessibility is a strong point, as Call of Duty can be played on multiple gaming platforms, but the price can be a hurdle, with the latest titles retailing for around $70, setting a precedent for future releases.
I’ve been playing Call of Duty for a few years now; I’d say my skill level is pretty average, but I understand the mechanics and strategies well. I keep up with updates that affect gameplay and weapon stats because they can influence my win rate in the current Call of Duty landscape. While I’ve used both controller and mouse-and-keyboard setups, I prefer the latter since I'm more accustomed to controlling the mouse. Many players stick with controllers for the aim assist feature, which automatically targets enemies when the crosshair is close.
One downside is the massive download size, typically around 120-150 gigabytes. This can consume a lot of storage on consoles like PlayStation or Xbox, often forcing players to delete other games to make room. I’ve had to uninstall several titles just to install Call of Duty, which is frustrating because I lose all my saved progress and memories from those games. It’s annoying that one game file takes up so much space.
Another issue with recent Call of Duty titles is the constant graphic updates, which enhance visuals with richer colors and smoother textures. While the quality is impressive, not all gaming systems can handle such high-end graphics. Even with lower settings, I faced problems when I played on my old Xbox One, where lag and loading issues were common. Now that I have a gaming laptop with more storage, I still encounter performance problems. These frustrations often lead me to switch to games that run more smoothly.
In the past, Call of Duty offered realistic visuals without needing a powerful system or excessive storage. However, the latest releases seem to require top-of-the-line equipment. With the hefty price tag of $70, plus the constant need for sufficient storage and high-quality graphics, enjoying the game has become increasingly difficult for many players.
(Image from Reddit.com)
No comments:
Post a Comment